Method of Introducing New Requirements into the

Existing Standardization System at the Enterprise

I.P. Vasil’eva, Head, Department for the Support of Academic Councils of the University, Postgraduate of the Department of Production of Aircraft and Quality Management in Mechanical Engineering of the FSAO Higher Education, S.P. Korolev Samara National Research University (Samara University), Samara, Russia, Wlada98@mail.ru

key words

standardization, norms integration, FMEA, requirements

References

I studied the actual problem of introducing standards in the organization’s quality management system, the types of interaction. To analyze the consequences of potential inconsistencies in the interaction of standards, I proposed the FMEA model and the methodology for the overall assessment of the organization’s standardization system. When developing standards for innovative products and/or technology, interactions arise that can be described using set theory. As a result, the requirements of the standards either complement, or they contradict one another.

As the number of standards increases, there are risks of their requirements conflict. As a result of the analysis of standards, it becomes necessary to give an overall assessment of the organization’s standardization system. To this end, I propose to evaluate the following parameters: workload requirements, their feasibility, interaction, openness, accessibility, compliance with documented information and deadlines requirements.

1. Antipov D.V. Model’ sistemy upravleniya promyshlennogo predpriyatiya, obespechivayushchaya ustoychivuyu konkurentosposobnost’ [Model of industrial enterprise management system, ensuring sustainable competitiveness], Kazanskaya nauka, 2012, no. 4, pp. 47–51.
2. Butkevich R.V., Klochkov Yu.S., Yanitskaya T.S., Yarygin S.A. Metodicheskie osnovy kolichestvennogo otsenivaniya tekhnologicheskikh protsessov [Methodical bases of quantitative estimation of technological processes], Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk, 2005, v. 7, no. 2, pp. 456–463.
3. Varlamova L.N. Standartizatsiya upravleniya dokumentatsiey / Sbornik uchebno-metodicheskoy dokumentatsii po napravleniyu podgotovki bakalavrov Dokumentovedenie i arkhivovedenie. Variativnaya chast’, profil’ Organizatsiya upravleniya elektronnymi dokumentami. Sostaviteli: M.V. Larin, L.N. Varlamova [Standardization of document management], Moscow, 2015, pp. 154–183.
4. Klochkov Yu.S. Metodika otsenki tselostnosti sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva [Methodology for assessing the integrity of the quality management system], Kazanskaya nauka, 2010, no. 12, pp. 40–42.
5. Klochkov Yu.S. Analiz protsessov sistem menedzhmenta kachestva so znachimoy doley samoorganizatsii [Analysis of the processes of quality management systems with a significant share of self-organization], Standarty i kachestvo, 2011, no. 5, pp. 56–59.
6. Klochkov Yu.S. Model’ sovremennoy protsedury FMEA [Model of modern FMEA procedure], Kazanskaya nauka, 2010, no. 12, pp. 42–45.
7. Kokhtina M.V. Sravnitel’nyy analiz mezhdunarodnykh i rossiyskikh standartov, ustanavlivayushchikh trebovaniya k sisteme menedzhmenta kachestva predpriyatiy vysokotekhnologichnykh otrasley promyshlennosti [Comparative analysis of international and Russian standards that establish requirements for the quality management system of enterprises in high-tech industries], Fundamental’nye problemy radioelektronnogo priborostroeniya, 2013, v.13, no. 6, pp. 54–58.
8. Shalova L.M. Standarty ISO kak kollektivnyy opyt [ISO standards as a collective experience], Standarty i kachestvo, 2014, no. 6(924), pp. 56–58.
9. Doyle M. From change novice to change expert: Issues of learning, development and support, Personnel Review, 2002, no. 31(4), pp. 465–481.
10. Dunphy D., Stace D. The strategic management of corporate change, Human Relations, 1993, no. 46(8), pp. 905–918.
11. Grundy T. Managing Strategic Change, London, Kogan Page, 1993, 427 P.