Formation of the Post-industrial Science Development

Mechanism on the General Theory of Services

Dr. Assoc. Prof. V.V. Glushchenko, Professor, Department of Management and Personnel Management Organization, Russian University of Transportation, Moscow, Russia, glu-valery@yandex.ru

Dr. Assoc. Prof. I.I. Glushchenko , Professor, Department of Accounting and Statistics, Russian State Social

University, Moscow, Russia prepodavatel-gii@mail.ru

key words

science, functions, role, essence, mechanism, development, globalization, services, efficiency

References

The subject of the article is the essence and structure of the mechanism for the development and enhancement of the effectiveness of post-industrial science. The article is devoted to the formation of a mechanism for the development and enhancement of the efficiency of post-industrial science on the basis of a general theory of services. The relevance of the article is related to the growing importance of science in the context of post-industrial globalization, in the Russian science, the purpose of this article is to form a mechanism for the development and increase of the effectiveness of the post-industrial science, to achieve this goal, the following problems are solved: the nature of post-industrial science is explored; the formation of a mechanism for the development of post-industrial science on the basis of a general theory of services, the importance of such important elements of the mechanism of development and increasing the effectiveness of post-industrial science as mentoring, communication, attention, proposed the functions of state academies of science in the development and enhancement of post-industrial science, and the reliability of scientometric assessments, it was proposed to use blocking technology, a method of financing scientific investigations and innovative projects.

1. Ivanov V. Nauka i innovatsii v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Science and innovation in the context of globalization], Obshchestvo i ekonomika,
2014, no. 2–3, pp. 5–16.
2. Ostapyuk S.F., Filin S.A. Formirovanie i otsenka effektivnosti nauchno-tekhnicheskikh i innovatsionnykh programm [Formation and evaluation of the effectiveness of scientific and technical and innovative programs], Moscow, Blagovest-V, 2004, 320 P.
3. Glushchenko V.V. Riski innovatsionnoy i investitsionnoy deyatel’nosti v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Risks of innovation and investment activity in the context of globalization], Zheleznodorozhnyy, Moscow Region, NPTs Kryl’ya, 2006, 230 P.
4. Filosofiya, ver. 11 [Philosophy], Rostov-na-Donu, Feniks, 2005, 576 P.
5. Kokhanovskiy V.P. Filosofiya i metodologiya nauki [Philosophy and methodology of science], Rostov-na-Donu, Feniks, 1999, 576 P.
6. Glushchenko V.V., Glushchenko I.I. Sovershenstvovanie filosofii i metodologii nauki, upravleniya i prognostiki: paradigma intellektual’nogo upravleniya [Perfection of philosophy and methodology of science, management and prognostication: the paradigm of intellectual management], Moscow, Glushchenko Valeriy Vladimirovich, 2009, 120 P.
7. Kuptsov A.S., Volkova E.A. Rol’ innovatsiy v epokhu globalizatsii mirovoy ekonomiki. V sbornike: Teoriya i praktika razvitiya sotsial’no- ekonomicheskikh sistem [The role of innovation in the era of globalization of the world economy], Ul’yanovsk, 2014, pp. 52–64.
8. Volkova T.A., Volkova S.A. Problemy i metody rasprostraneniya innovatsiy. Kachestvo i innovatsii v XXI veke. Materialy XIII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Problems and methods of innovation dissemination], 2015, pp. 47–50.
9. Sattarov E.A., Sklyar E.N. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie printsipov upravleniya marketingom innovatsiy na predpriyatiyakh v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviyakh [Theoretical substantiation of principles of management of marketing of innovations at the enterprises
in modern economic conditions], Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, 2015, no. 1(45), pp. 118–121.
10. Lutokhina E.A. Kraudsorsing kak sposob aktivatsii nelineynykh innovatsiy v usloviyakh globalizatsii [Crowdsourcing as a way to activate non-linear innovations in the context of globalization], Problemy upravleniya (Minsk), 2016, no. 2(59), pp. 29–31.
11. Glushchenko V.V., Glushchenko I.I. Paradigma formirovaniya nauchnogo obespecheniya sfery postindustrial’nykh uslug [The paradigm of the formation of scientific support for the sphere of post-industrial services], Byulleten’ nauki i praktiki, 2017, no. 10(23), pp. 228–243, DOI:10.5281/zenodo.1012389.
12. Glushchenko V.V., Glushchenko I.I. Metodicheskie problemy razvitiya innovatsionnogo predprinimatel’stva v vysokotekhnologichnom mashinostroenii v Rossii v usloviyakh global’nogo krizisa [Methodical problems of development of innovative entrepreneurship in high-tech engineering in Russia in the context of the global crisis], Problemy mashinostroeniya i avtomatizatsii, 2015, no. 1, pp. 25–33.
13. Langlois R.N., Cosgel M.M. Frank Knight on risk, uncertainty, and the firm: A new interpretation, Economic Inquiry, vol. XXXI, July 1993, pp. 456–465.
14. Glushchenko V.V., Glushchenko I.I. Effektivnostnyy podkhod k izmereniyu urovnya kompetentnosti [Efficiency approach to measuring the level of competence], Kompetentnost’, 2016, no. 7, 8(138, 139), pp.7–16, 18–24.
15. Kolesov V.A. Ispol’zovanie tekhnologii blokcheyn v uchebnom protsesse dlya zashchity intellektual’noy sobstvennosti. V sbornike Distantsionnye obrazovatel’nye tekhnologii. Materialy II Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy internet-konferentsii [Use of blocking technology in the educational process to protect intellectual property], 2017, pp. 343–347.