Kompetentnost' 5/126/2015
ISSN 1993-8780
MANAGEMENT 35
On the Functional Evaluation Model
of the Integrated Structures’ Innovative Potential
S.N. Rusakov, Applicant, FSUE, STANDARTINFORM, Moscow, Russia, strecha@gostinfo.ru
key words
production, innovations, model, system, dual technology, integrated structure, military-industrial complex
Referenсes
The approach to the construction of a model for assessing the integrated structures’ innovative potential in the production of dualuse products is on consideration. We propose a universal form of the generalized indicator of efficiency on the basis of the conformity principle of the integrated structure of innovative potential. As system indicators of innovative potential estimation the groups of indicators are on consideration. Each of them fully reveals the willingness and ability of the integrated structure to create and use (under the existing resource constraints) innovation for the purpose of obtaining different kinds of effects: sectoral, position on foreign and domestic markets, national security.
We offer a multifunctional model of innovation capacity and the procedure of its construction with several stages. Among them are such points as establishment the feasibility of the relationship between resources, the level of competitiveness and economic performance; the formation of the system of target indicators in the production of dualuse products; structuring; the choice of means and methods; implementation of baseline data collection, its processing, calculation and so on.
1. Kozin M.N. Tekhnologicheskaya modernizatsiya kak draiver razvitiya Rossiiskoy Federatsii [Technological modernization as the driver of the Russian Federation development], Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta, 2012. T. 12, no. 2, pp. 23–28.
2. Kozin M.N. Tekhnologicheskaya modernizatsiya kak glavnaya ekonomicheskaya zadacha Rossii [Technological modernization as the main economic Russian task], Povolzhskiy torgovo-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2012, no. 1, pp. 57–69.
3. Valdaitsev S.V. Otsenka biznesa i upravlenie stoimost’yu predpriyatiya [Business evaluation and management of enterprise value], Moscow, YuNITI-DANA, 2001, 720 p.
4. Lomakin M.I. Optimal’nyy portfel’ investitsionnykh proektov [The optimal portfolio of investment projects], Investitsii v Rossii, 2001, no. 2, pp. 43.
5. Gadzhimetov B.E. Integratsiya kak faktor modernizatsii promyshlennosti sovremennoy Rossii [Integration as a factor of the industry modernization in modern Russia], Region: sistemy, ekonomika, upravlenie, 2012, no. 1, pp. 13–20.
6. Knyaz’nedelin R.A., Kurbanov A.Kh., Plotnikov V.A. Spetsifika oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa kak ob”ekta gosudarstvennoy promyshlennoy politiki v sovremennykh usloviyakh [The specificity of the military-industrial complex as an object of state industrial policy in modern conditions], Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2013, no. 8(37), pp. 100–107.
7. Plotnikov V.A. Innovatsionnaya aktivnost’ rossiiskikh promyshlennykh predpriyatiy kak faktor ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti, Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Seriya: Istoriya [The innovative activity of Russian industrial enterprises
as a factor of economic security], Politologiya. Ekonomika. Informatika, 2012. T. 23, no. 13-1, pp. 5–10.
8. Lomakin M.I., Niyazov R.A. Otsenka innovatsionnogo potentsiala sotrudnika proektnoy gruppy predpriyatiya [Estimation of innovative potential of the enterprise project team member], Nauka i biznes: puti razvitiya, 2013, no. 11(29), pp. 95–99.
9. Kameneva N.A. Osnovnye pokazateli effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya ob”ektov promyshlennoy sobstvennosti [The main indicators of efficiency of industrial property], Innovatsii v nauke, 2013, no. 28, pp. 211–220.
10. Nakenova S.M. Upravlenie protsessami otsenki, analiza, modelirovaniya i prognozirovaniya innovatsionnogo razvitiya kontserna [Process management evaluation, analysis, modeling and forecasting of innovative development group], Ekonomika. Biznes. Pravo, 2014, no. 2, pp. 4–33.
11. Gorokhova A.E. Otsenka innovatsii: ekonomicheskoe soderzhanie i metodicheskoe obespechenie [Innovation evaluation: the economic content and methodological support], Izvestiya Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta MAMI. — 2013. T. 5,
no. 1(15), pp. 200–206.
12. Shul’gin A.V. Otsenka effektivnosti gosudarstvenno-chastnogo partnerstva v razvitii innovatsionnykh sistem [Evaluating the effectiveness of public-private partnership in the development of innovative systems], Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta inzhenernykh tekhnologiy, 2012, no. 2, pp. 197–200.
13. Lomakin M.I. Model’ optimizatsii zatrat na kachestvo biznes-protsessov predpriyatiya [Model cost optimization on the quality of business processes], Transportnoe delo Rossii, 2011, no. 6, pp.103–105.
14. Gil’manova R.I. Metody otsenki ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti innovatsii s uchetom ikh zhiznennogo tsikla [Methods for evaluating
the economic efficiency of innovation with regard to their life-cycle], Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal,
2011, no. 28, pp. 181–192.