Using Mathematical Models while Harmonization of the Standard Requirements

Dr. M.A. Polyakova, Associate Professor, FSBEI HE, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia, m.polyakova-64@mail.ru

Dr. Yu.V. Danilova, Research Engineer, FSBEI HE, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Magnitogorsk, Russia

key words

standard, mathematical assessment, customer, manufacturer

References

We have explained that mathematical methods development is necessary for assessing the position of consumers and producers in the development of standard requirements. It is an actual problem. We consider that the using mathematical apparatus helps to formalize the decision-making process. The opportunity of full consumer and producer’s requirements assessment is shown. It is based on mathematical models for the calculation of local (in case if index value is set to the nominal value) and interval (in case if index value is set as an interval) estimates. We are confident that an advantage of this approach is the use of well-known qualimetry formulas for assessing the individual indicators of production quality. These make this approach universal. We believe it allows to consider not only quantitative differences in the individual indicators importance, but also qualitative. In other words is the status of dominant or compensated index.

1. Kontseptsiya sistemy tekhnicheskogo regulirovaniya v metallurgii [Conception of technical regulation system in metallurgy], http://www.amror.ru/gen_dir/koncepciya.htm.
2. Rubin G.Sh., Polyakova M.A. Razvitie nauchnykh osnov standartizatsii [Development of the standardization scientific basics], Vestnik

Magnitogorskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta im. G.I. Nosova, 2014, no. 1.

3. Aronov I.Z., Maksimova O.V., Zazhigalkin A.V. Issledovanie vremeni dostizheniya konsensusa v rabote tekhnicheskikh komitetov
po standartizatsii na osnove regulyarnykh Markovskikh tsepey [Investigation of the time to reach the consensus in activity of technical committees on standardization based on regular Markov chains], Komp’yuternye issledovaniya i modelirovanie, 2015, vol. 7, no. 4.
4. Zazhigalkin A.V., Aronov I.Z., Maksimova O.V. Model upravleniya vremenem dostizheniya konsensusa v tekhnicheskikh komitetakh
[Time Management Model for consensus-building on technical committees], Kompetentnost’, 2015, no. 6.
5. Aronov I.Z., Zazhigalkin A.V. Upravlenie rabotoy tekhnicheskikh komitetov po standartizatsii s tsel’yu dostizheniya konsensusa
[Activity management of technical committees on standardization for consensus-building], Sertifikatsiya, 2014, no.3.
6. Aronov I.Z., Zazhigalkin A.V., Tolstunova T.V. Matematicheskie modeli obespecheniya konsensusa v rabotakh TK po standartizatsii
[Mathematical models for consensus-building in the activity of TC on standardization], Standarty i kachestvo, 2014, no. 7.
7. Rubin G.Sh., Polyakova M.A., Gun G.S. Modelirovanie tekhnologicheskogo transformirovaniya na osnove S-obraznykh krivykh razvitiya [Technologic transformation simulation based on S-shape curves development], Vestnik Magnitogorskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta im. G.I. Nosova, 2015, no. 1.
8. Rubin G., Gun G., Polyakova M. New view to quality assessment and decision making. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015, v. 799–
800.
9. Rubin G., Polyakova M., Gun G. Simulation of technological parameters changing with the satiation effect. Proceedings of the 2015
International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics. Ed. by M. Gholami, R. Jiwari, A. Tavasoli, 2015, v. 122.
10. Rubin G.Sh., Danilova Yu.V., Polyakova M.A. Matematicheskaya model’ protsedury soglasovaniya pozitsiy potrebitelya i izgotovitelya [Mathematical model of the procedure for matching customer and manufacturer positions], Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal’nogo universiteta, seriya ‘Tekhnika i tekhnologii’, oktyabr’ 2015, v. 5, no. 8.
11. Danilova Yu.V. Sovershenstvovanie protsedury razrabotki standartov na metalloizdeliya posredstvom formalizatsii soglasovaniya pozitsiy zainteresovannykh storon [Improving the standards development process on metal products by formalizing the coordination of positions
of stakeholders], thesis of candidate degree in technical sciences, speciality 05.02.23, Magnitogorsk, 2016, 155 p.
12. Polyakova M.A., Rubin G.Sh., Danilova Yu.V. Matematicheskaya otsenka stepeni blizosti pozitsiy potrebitelya i izgotovitelya v khode soglasovaniya trebovaniy standarta na metalloproduktsiyu pri razlichnykh vidakh normirovaniya pokazateley [Mathematical assessment
of the degree of customer’s and manufacturer’s positions matching during harmonization the demands of standard for metal ware product with different variants of indices setting], Kompetentnost’, 2017, vol. 142, no. 1(142).
13. Rubin G.Sh., Gun G.S. Logicheskie zakony otsenki kachestva produktsii [Logic laws of product quality assessment], Magnitogorsk,
1981. Dep. v VINITI 19.09.1981, no. 4105-81 В.
14. Gun G.S. Upravlenie kachestvom vysokotochnykh profiley [Quality management of exacting metal profiles], Metallurgiya, 1984,
152 P.
15. Rubin G.Sh. Vybor i issledovanie ratsional’nykh tekhnologicheskikh skhem polucheniya vysokotochnykh fasonnykh profiley na osnove kompleksnoy otsenki effektivnosti tekhnologii [Choice and investigation of rational technological schemes for exacting steel shapes manufacturing based on the complex assessment the technology effectiveness], thesis of candidate degree in technical sciences, Magnitogorsk, 1983, 142 P.
16. Rubin G.Sh. Kvalimetriya metiznogo proizvodstva [Qualimetry of metal ware manufacturing], Magnitogorsk, 2012, 167 P.