Permanent Improvement Model of Trade Policy in a Large Enterprise

Dr. A.N. Karamyshev, Associate Professor, Naberezhnye Chelny Institute of the Kazan Federal University, Naberezhnye

Chelny, Russia, antonkar2005@yandex.ru

key words

profitability, optimization, business management, maturity of business process, improvement of activities

References

Many models for assessing the maturity of the enterprise process management system (in particular, CMMI, the classification of process control system’s states for industrial enterprises, proposed by A.N. Karamyshev, I.I. Makhmutov, S.A. Sych, the five- level maturity model of BI, etc.) the highest level is the desire for excellence. At this level, constant improvement of all enterprise subsystems and increase of its overall competitiveness are carried out. However, quantitative methods, realizing the desire for excellence, were not proposed. At present, the highest level of process management maturity’s implementation is, in many ways, a non-systemic process. In this regard, the task of systemically determining the most significant and maximizing economic impact points of efforts is relevant.

In this article, I have proposed a model for permanent improvement of commodity policy for a large machine-building enterprise, which allows to determine products with low profitability, to plan measures to increase the specific and total profit, taking into account the share of enterprise’s overhead costs, attributed to the cost of each type of products.

1. Mitskevich A. Raspredelenie kompleksnykh zatrat v bukhuchete. Primery [Distribution of complex costs in accounting. Examples],

Ekonomika i zhizn’, 2007, no. 3, pp. 4–5.

2. Sych S.A., Shamov V.A., Saraykin A.V. Metodika mul’tibazisnogo raspredeleniya nakladnykh raskhodov: novyy vzglyad na ABC­metod
[Method of multi­basis distribution of overheads: a new look at the ABC method], Upravlencheskiy uchet, 2008, no. 6, pp. 36–45.
3. Kaplan R.S., Anderson S.R. Time­driven activity­based costing. A simpler and more powerful path to higher profits. Harvard Business

School Press, 2007, 220 P.

4. Shamaev I. Activity­based costing i activity­based budgeting, 2012; http://ivan­shamaev.ru/ activity­based­costing­and­activity­based­
budgeting/.
5. Tel’nov Yu.F. Reinzhiniring biznes­protsessov. Komponentnaya metodologiya [Reengineering of business processes. Component methodology], Moscow, Finansy i statistika, 2005, 320 P.
6. Smirnov Yu.N. Metodologiya byudzhetirovaniya biznes­protsessov predpriyatiya [Methodology of budgeting business processes at the enterprise], Integral, 2008, no. 4, pp. 74–75.
7. Makhmutov I.I., Karamyshev A.N., Sych S.A. Metodika otsenki uslug vspomogatel’nykh podrazdeleniy [Methodology for assessing the services of support units], Integral, 2008, no. 6, pp. 68–70.
8. Karamyshev A.N. Metodika rascheta sebestoimosti produktsii krupnogo mashinostroitel’nogo predpriyatiya s uchetom printsipa mnogotsiklichnogo raspredeleniya stoimosti vspomogatel’nykh biznes­protsessov [Method for calculating the production cost for a large machine­building enterprise, taking into account the principle of multi­cyclic cost allocation of auxiliary business processes], Ekonomika

i predprinimatel’stvo, 2016, no. 12, part 3, pp.1054–1061.

9. Karamyshev A.N. Printsip mnogotsiklichnosti otneseniya stoimosti vspomogatel’nykh biznes­protsessov na sebestoimost’ tovarnoy produktsii krupnykh promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [The multi­cycle attribution principle for the cost of auxiliary business processes
to the cost price of commercial products for large industrial enterprises], Vestnik BGTU im. V.G. Shukhova, 2017, no. 1, pp. 195–201.
10. Karamyshev A.N. Analiz sushchestvuyushchikh podkhodov k upravleniyu proizvodstvom produktsii [Analysis of the existing approaches to the industrial enterprise management], Kompetentnost’, 2017, no. 5, pp.47–51.
11. Karamyshev A.N. Osnovy prinyatiya upravlencheskikh resheniy na krupnykh mashinostroitel’nykh predpriyatiyakh [Basics of making managerial decisions at large machine­building enterprises], Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2017, no. 8, part 3, pp. 833–836.
12. Karamyshev A.N. Analiz upravlencheskikh resheniy o modernizatsii tekhnologiy vypolneniya osnovnykh i vspomogatel’nykh biznes­ protsessov promyshlennogo predpriyatiya [Analysis of managerial decisions on the modernization of technologies for the implementation of basic and auxiliary business processes for industrial enterprise], Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2017, no. 2, part 2, pp. 816–820.
13. Karamyshev A.N. Analiz upravlencheskikh resheniy o rasshirenii assortimenta i uvelichenii ob”emov proizvodstva produktsii [Analysis of managerial decisions on expanding the range and increasing the volume of production], Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo, 2017, no. 7, pp. 833–836.