Acceptance Control of Finished Product. QMS Process Design

Dr. K.V. Zhegera, Associate Professor of Department, Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, Penza, Russia, jegera@yandex.ru

Dr. N.A. Petukhova, Associate Professor of Department, Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, Penza, Russia, npetukhova58@mail.ru

G.M. Kudratova, Magistracy Student, Penza State University of Architecture and Construction, Penza, Russia, kudratova96@list.ru

key words

quality management system, process, SADT-model, acceptance control

References

The quality management problem’s enterprise is one of the factors of increasing competitiveness. We chose the acceptance finished products process, which plays an important role in ensuring the quality and safety of products.

We examined the main processes of the quality management system at the enterprise, presented the scheme of their interaction, made up the SADT-model of the finished products acceptance process. Its reflects the way of implementing the agreed and reliable structural decomposition. We also developed a process passport and compiled a table for recording quality records.

We believe that the development of the Acceptance Control of Finished Products process will allow to optimize the work of the enterprise, prevent the production of defective products and will provide an opportunity to learn the needs of customers through surveys. All this will increase the competitiveness of products which will increase the competitiveness of products.

1. Vladimirov D.V. Strategiya razvitiya — kachestvennaya i bezopasnaya produktsiya [Development strategy — high-quality and safe products], Vse o myase, 2011, no. 1, 32 P.
2. Tan' Dunsyuy. Vseobshchee upravlenie kachestvom na predpriyatii [Totall quality management in the enterprise], Perspektivy nauki,
2010, no.12(14), pp. 92–95.
3. Wiengarten F., Humphreys P., Onofrei G., Fynes B. The adoption of multiple certification standards: Perceived performance implications of quality, environmental and health & safety certifications, Prod. Plann. Contr., 2017, no. 1.
4. Nezhnikova E.V. Problemy sozdaniya i funktsionirovaniya sistem menedzhmenta kachestva [The problems of quality management systems creation and functioning], Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, 2013, no. 6–4, pp. 958–962.
5. GOST R ISO 9001–2015 Quality management systems. Requirements.
6. Dudkina I.M., Dudkin D.V., Luk'yanova A. Dokumentirovanie sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva [Documenting the quality management system], Molodoy uchenyy, 2016, no. 7.4, pp. 52–54.
7. Marde S. The contribution of ISO 9001 to certified companies: manager and employee perceptions, Quality Management Journal, 2015, no. 1, pp. 47–60.
8. Chiarini A. Setting Strategies outside a Typical Environmental Perspective Using ISO 14001 Certification: ISO 14001 Certification,

Business Strategy and the Environment, Chiarini Andrea, 26.

9. Goncharov E.N. A nuzhny li vladel’tsy protsessov? [Do you need process owners?], Standarty i kachestvo, 2007, no. 6, pp. 68–71.
10. Repin V.V., Eliferov V.G. Protsessnyy podkhod k upravleniyu. Modelirovanie biznes-protsessov [Process management approach. Modeling of business processes], Moscow, Standarty i kachestvo, 2004.