Integrated Assessment Model of Experts’ Competence

Prof. Dr. V.L. Lyaskovskiy, Professor, Senior Researcher, Federal State Budgetary Institution “46 Central Scientific

Research Institute” Russian Defenсe Ministry, Moscow, Russia, dop_big@mail.ru

Dr. S.S. Smirnov, Associate Professor, Deputy Head of Department, Federal State Budgetary Institution “46 Central

Scientific Research Institute” Russian Defenсe Ministry, Moscow, Russia, sss-smirnov@mail.ru

Dr. A.Yu. Pronin, Senior Researcher, Federal State Budgetary Institution, “46 Central Scientific Research Institute” Russian

Defenсe Ministry, Moscow, Russia, pronin46@bk.ru

key words

expert, examination in the scientific and technical sphere, evaluation of experts’ competence by ranking

References

The selection of experts, the formation of expert groups remain the urgent problems today, as the reliability of expert assessments largely determines the quality of the finished document. We consider that an appropriate solution to this problem may be the experts’ competence assessment by ranking. We offer a model that allows a comprehensive assessment of the experts’ competence, taking into account their qualifications in the assessed scientific and technical sphere, and also helps to adjust the assessments of individual experts’ competence by representatives of the preliminary expert group. The main advantage of the proposed model is the simplicity of measurement procedures, which does not require complex and time-consuming training of persons involved in work. We believe this model can find wide practical application in the formation of projects of state and federal target programs.

1. Lyaskovskiy V.L., Smirnov S.S., Pronin А.Yu. Metodika otsenki kompetentnosti ekspertov v protsesse formirovaniya predlozheniy
v proekty programnykh dokumentov [The methodology for assessing the experts’ competence in the process of forming proposals in draft program documents], Elektronnyy nauchnyy zhurnal Vooruzhenie i ekonomika, 2013, no. 3(24), pp. 54–59.
2. Irzgaev G.Kh. Ekspertnye metody upravleniya tekhnologichnost’yu promyshlennykh izdeliy [Expert control methods processability industrial products], Moscow, Infra-Inzheneriya, 2010, 192 P.
3. Sleptsova М.V., Melashenko Т.V. Osobennosti vybora ekspertov dlya provedeniya pedagogicheskoy ekspertizy [Features of the experts’
choice for pedagogical expertise], Nauchnyy internet-zhurnal Mir Nauki, 2015, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
4. Rybakov Yu.L., Golubev V.P. and etc. Obzor sushchestvuyushchikh v nauchno-tekhnicheskoy sfere ekspertnykh tekhnologiy (iz opyta raboty otechestvennykh ekspertnykh sistem) [Review of existing expert technologies in the scientific and technical sphere (from the experience of domestic expert systems)], Innovatika i ekspertiza, 2012, no. 2(9), pp. 173–182.
5. Bukharin S.N., Divueva N.А. Problema otsenki kompetentnosti s uchetom psikhologicheskikh svoystv eksperta [The problem of
assessing competence, taking into account the psychological properties of the expert], Innovatika i ekspertiza, 2013, no. 1(10), pp. 108–115.
6. Margolin E. Metodika obrabotki dannykh ekspertnogo oprosa [Techniques for processing expert survey data], Poligrafiya, 2006, no. 5, pp. 14–16.
7. Lukicheva L.I., Egorychev D.N. Upravlencheskie resheniya [Management solutions], Moscow, Omega-L, 2009, 383 P.
8. Postnikov V.М. Analiz podkhodov k formirovaniyu sostava ekspertnoy gruppy, orientirovannoy na podgotovku I prinyatie resheniy [The analysis of approaches to the formation of expert group membership focused on preparing and making decisions], Elektronnyy nauchno-tekhnicheskiy zhurnal Nauka i obrazovanie, 2012, no. 5, pp. 333–346.