Kompetentnost' 9–10/150–151/2017

ISSN 1993-8780

TRAINING 19

Learning Organization as a Way of Solving

Personnel Problems

Dr. Е.Yu. Sergeeva, Researcher, FSBEI HPE Kemerovo State University (Belovo Branch), Belovo, Russia, sergeevaeu3@gmail.com

key words

system of continuous education, lifelong learning, blended

learning, labor organization, labor productivity, ICT, human capital

References

Today, the way of adapting a business to an unstable environment is investing in human capital — creating a learning organization through a learning system, transferring, sharing knowledge, accumulating human capital within the company. The creation of learning organization is necessary to constantly update the professional knowledge and skills of employees. The corporate training system contributes to the improvement of labor efficiency and, in general, the company’s competitiveness. However, it is impossible to build a learning organization without a comprehensive, systemic approach that can debug the mechanism of the enterprise’s functioning and increase its adaptive capacity for the external environment. In this article, I have investigated the need to create a learning organization in an environment of unstable external environment, as well as the negative impact of unskilled personnel on building a learning company, proposed an algorithm for necessary organizational changes in the company.

1. Manuti A., Pastore S., Scardigno A. F., Giancaspro M. L., Morciano D. Formal and informal learning in the workplace: a research review. International Journal of Training and Development 19:1. ISSN 1360-3736 doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12044.


2. Noe R. A. еt al. Learning in the Twenty-First Century Workplace. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2014, 1:245–75.
3. Castro G. M. de, Delgado-Verde M., Navas-Lopez J. E., Cruz-Gonzalez J. The moderating role of innovation culture in the relationship between knowledge assets and product innovation. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80 (2013).
4. O’Reilly III C. A., Tushman M. L. Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future; https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2285704.
5. Aguinis H., Kraiger K. Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society. Annu. Rev. Psychol.
2009. 60:451–74.
6. Bucciarellia E., Muratoreb F., Odoardib I. Consolidation processes of human capital in modern economic growth dynamics: an estimate based on the role of European corporate e-learning activities. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences 9 (2010).
7. Diaz-Fernandez M., Pasamar-Reyes S., Valle-Cabrera R. Human capital and human resource management to achieve ambidextrous learning: A structural perspective, BRQ Business Research Quarterly, v. 20, no. 1, pp. 63–77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.03.002.
8. Gref G.O. Rossiyskie vuzy dolzhny obuchat’ navykam XXI veka [Russian universities should teach the skills of the XXI century], RIA Novosti; https://ria.ru/society/20161207/1483041883.html.
9. Senge P. М. Pyataya distsiplina. Iskusstvo i praktika samoobuchayushcheysya organizatsii [The fifth discipline. The art and practice of a self-learning organization], Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2009, 448 P.
10. The Future of Jobs. — World Economic Forum; http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.
11. Povyshenie kvalifikatsii i professional’naya podgotovka rabotnikov organizatsii v 2016 godu [Professional development and training
of organizations’ employees in 2016], Byulleten’ FSGS; http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/publications/
catalog/bbd2da 8043f81ba38a78cbd92111eac8.

12. A c a H. B., Tanb F. Z., Altntac F. A Strategic Approach For Learning Organizations: Mental Models, Procedia — Social and
Behavioral Sciences 235 (2016), pp. 2–11.
13. Kim H.-J., Hawley J. D., Cho D., Hyund Y. and Kim J.-H. The influence of learning activity on low-skilled workers’ skill improvement in the South Korean manufacturing industry, Human Resource Development International, 2016, v. 19, no. 3, 209–228.
14. Fletcher L. Training perceptions, engagement, and performance: comparing work engagement and personal role engagement, Human
Resource Development International, 2016, v. 19, no. 1, 4–26.
15. Argote L., Fahrenkopf E. Knowledge transfer in organizations: The roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks, Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2016, v. 136, no. C, pp. 146–159.
16. Shin H. W., Picken J. C., Dess G. G. Revisiting the learning organization: How to create it. Organizational Dynamics, 2017, 46(1), pp. 46–56.