Kompetentnost' 6/157/2018

ISSN 1993-8780

MANAGEMENT 47

Organizational Culture and Competence in the Quality Management System

Assoc. Prof. Dr. E.V. Vorontsov, Professor, Organization and Management Department Belarusian State Economic

University, Ratomka, Minsk Region, Republic of Belarus, vev1941@tut.by

key words

organizational culture, initiative, competence, knowledge, skills, social action, intellectual resources, human resources, quality management

References

I considered the role of organizational culture and initiative in acquiring competence. The organizational culture is a tool that ensures the development of an initiative aimed at acquiring competencies that ensure high quality, productivity and labor performance, I believe. Knowledge should be perceived by management not as an instrument, but as a mode of action, transformed into the ability to act and understand.

The mobilizing organizational culture determines the behavior of the personnel of the collective, makes it initiative and highly productive, stimulates the acquisition of knowledge, skills and skills, and increases the professional competence of the staff. Values in the organization are: diligence, labor discipline, mastering of effective working methods, flexibility and rationalization of work, initiative, ensuring employees’ loyalty to leadership, using effective methods of communication and cooperation, methods of operational management.

The role of organizational culture and initiative in acquiring competence is considered. I’m argued that the corresponding organizational culture is a tool that ensures the development of an initiative aimed at acquiring competencies that ensure high quality, productivity and work efficiency. Knowledge should be perceived by management not as an instrument, but as a mode of action, transformed into the ability to act and understand.

1. Vorontsov E.V. Proizvodstvennyy kollektiv kak sub’ekt sotsial’noy initsiativy: Avtoreferat [Work collective as a subject of social initiative], Minsk, 1987.
2. Vorontsov E.V. Proizvodstvennyy kollektiv kak sub’ekt sotsial’noy initsiativy: Dissertatsiya [Work collective as a subject of social initiative], Minsk, 1987.
3. Lensioni P. Serdtse kompanii. Pochemu organizatsionnaya kul’tura znachit bol’she, chem strategiya ili finansy [The heart of the company. Why organizational culture means more than strategy or finance], Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2013.
4. Kak Dell vozrozhdal svoyu dushu [How Dell revived its soul]; http://kommersant.ru/doc/ 860103/print.
5. Raven Dzh. Kompetentnost’ v sovremennom obshchestve [Competence in modern society], Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2002.
6. Raven Dzh. Pedagogicheskoe testirovanie: Problemy, zabluzhdeniya, perspektivy [Pedagogical Testing: Problems, Misconceptions, Prospects], Moscow, Kogito-Tsentr, 2001.
7. Chetyrekhkratnyy rost effektivnosti [Fourfold increase in efficiency], Forbes, 2018, no. 22.
8. Vorontsov E.V. Informatsiya i znaniya v usloviyakh tranzitivnoy ekonomiki. Pravo i ekonomika — prikladnye novatsii / nauch. red. G.B. Shishko [Information and knowledge in a transitional economy. Law and Economics — Applied Innovations: Materials], Minsk, Interpoligraf, 2011, pp. 25–30.
9. Demin A.I. Informatsionnaya teoriya ekonomiki [Information theory of economics], Moscow, Palev, 1996.
10. Demin A.I. Paradigma dualizma: prostranstvo — vremya, informatsiya — energiya [The paradigm of dualism: space is time, information is energy], Moscow, LKI, 2007.
11. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary], Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1983.
12. Nonaka I., Takeuchi Kh. Kompaniya — sozdatel’ znaniya. Zarozhdenie i razvitie innovatsii v yaponskikh firmakh [The company is the creator of knowledge. The origin and development of innovation in Japanese firms], Moscow, Olimp-Biznes, 2003.
13. Shchedrovitskiy G.P. Orgupravlencheskoe myshlenie: ideologiya, metodologiya, tekhnologiya [Organizational and management thinking: ideology, methodology, technology], Moscow, Studiya Artemiya Lebedeva, 2014.