Kompetentnost' 3/124/2015
ISSN 1993-8780
RESEARCH 53
Favoritism: Research of Essence by Means of Historical Approach
O.A. Panshin, Deputy Chief of Department, Federal Agency on Technical Regulating and Metrology, Moscow, Russia, ukadr@gost.ru
key words
historical aspect, process genesis favoritism, corruption, government, political situation, present
Referenсes
I think, the appeal to a subject of the favoritism existence in Russia as the element functioning along with protectionism in more powerful system, named corruption, is submitted an actual and demanded task. Traditions of relationship between people in a ruling clique create unique type of the person is object of the state power and the subject who realizes it at the same time. This factor had impact on formation of modern officials in general. Despite a significant amount of publications, the subject of favoritism doesn’t cease to interest not only researchers, but also those who try to understand the present and to foresee the future of the fatherland. As element of corruption and basis of survivability of the considered phenomenon and analysis of existence of favoritism in a control system of a modern Russian political situation the author applies historical approach to research of essence of the existence favoritism problem. The application of historical approach in my research of a favoritism problem helped to prove that it is necessary to help only to talents.
1. Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy [Complete works], v. 49, v. 39.
2. Bol’shaya yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya [Big legal encyclopedia], Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Eksmo, 2005.
3. Tabachnik D.V., Voronin V.N. Ubiystvo Stolypina [Stolypin’s murder], Sergiev Posad, Izdatel’stvo Folio, 2010.
4. Pan’shin O.A. Protektsionizm: element sistemy korruptsionnykh praktik ili progressivnoe yavlenie? [Protectionism. The study of its nature using systemic and institutional approaches], Kompetentnost’, 2014, no. 3(114).
5. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’ [Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary], Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1983.
6. Teoriya upravleniya [Theory of management], http://www.allendy.ru.
7. Bespal’ko A.A., http://www.s-director.ru/magazine/magdocs/view/85.html.
8. Yuridicheskaya elektronnaya biblioteka [Legal electronic library], http://www.pravo.eup.ru.
9. Http://www.esperanto.mv.ru.
10. Portnov A. Rodstvennaya dusha [Soulmate], http://www.peoples.ru.
11. Paramonova S.P. Favoritizm kak element sotsial’no-politicheskikh otnosheniy [Favoritism is element of the socio-political relations], http://www.rae.ru.
12. Kuzovkov Yu.V. Istoriya korruptsii v Rossii [Corruption history in Russia], http://www.yuri-kuzovkov.ru.
13. Efremova T.F. Tolkovyy slovar’ [Explanatory dictionary], http://www.zipsites.ru.
НОВАЯ КНИ ГА
Кудеяров Ю.А., Медовикова Н.Я.
Метрологическая экспертиза технической документации
Учебное пособие. Изд. 2‑е перераб. и доп. — М.: АСМС, 2015.
Пособие посвящено одной из важнейших задач метрологического обеспечения производства — метрологической экспертизе технической документации (МЭТД). Рассматриваются вопросы организации работ по проведению метрологической экспертизы на предприятиях (организациях), задачи МЭТД, пути и методы их решения. Приводятся рекомендации по проведению метрологи- ческой экспертизы отдельных видов технической документации и перечень используемых норма- тивных документов. Учебное пособие может быть использовано специалистами метрологических служб и других подразделений предприятий (организаций), проводящих МЭТД, а также при про- фессиональной переподготовке специалистов квалификации «Специалист по метрологии».
По вопросам приобретения обращайтесь по адресу: Академия стандартизации, метрологии и сертификации (АСМС),